Keyword
MLB
Scores
Schedule
Pitching Probables
Standings
Statistics
Transactions
Injuries: AL | NL
Players
Power Alley
All-Time Stats
Message Board
Minor Leagues
MLB en espanol
CLUBHOUSE


THE ROSTER
Jim Caple
Peter Gammons
Joe Morgan
Rob Neyer
John Sickels
Jayson Stark
SHOP@ESPN.COM
TeamStore
ESPN Auctions
SPORT SECTIONS
Friday, August 30
 
Finding resolutions for key labor issues

Associated Press

What the owners and players wanted in the labor negotiations and how the issues got resolved:
Amateur Draft
Owners: Wanted to open the annual draft each June, currently limited to players in the United States (including Puerto Rico) and Canada, to players from around the world and cut it from 50 rounds to 38 rounds. Wanted to allow teams to trade draft picks, with some restrictions.
Players: Were open to concept of worldwide draft, but proposed 16 rounds. Worried that college juniors and seniors, junior college players and high school seniors (the group currently eligible) would be given preference over the newly eligible players, they wanted owners to centralize academies in Latin America that currently are run by individual teams, which would increase the knowledge of those players among all teams. Agreed that teams should be able to trade draft picks, and also would allow teams to trade negotiating rights to a selected player after the draft, a concept owners oppose.
Resolution: The sides shall establish a committee to establish rules for a worldwide amateur draft, which it will try to have in place for June 2003. Clubs have proposed 38 rounds, players 20. The committee will make the determination. The committee will consider, among other issue, whether teams should be allowed to trade draft picks and the negotiating rights to selected players. Teams that fail to sign picks in the first two rounds of the draft will receive an extra pick in the following year.

Commissioner's Discretionary Fund
Owners: Proposed that the commissioner could take $85 million from the central fund -- where money goes from national broadcasting and licensing contracts -- and distribute it unequally to teams. Because the money was to be taken equally from every team -- $2.83 million each -- at most $45 million could have been transferred to the 14 teams with the least revenue.
Players: Proposed moving $40 million unequally from the central fund to the low-revenue teams.
Resolution: A total of $10 million -- $333,333 from each team -- is taken from the central fund and may be redistributed by the commissioner.

Competitive-Balance Draft
Owners: The teams with the eight highest winning percentages during the previous three years would have been able to protect 25 players apiece in the draft. Only the teams with the eight lowest winning percentages during the previous three years would have been allowed to make selections, and they could have taken only one player each. The draft would have taken place annually after the World Series but before the end of the winter meetings each December.
Players: Were open to the concept.
Resolution: Not included in agreement.

Contraction
Owners: They claimed they had the right to eliminate teams but must bargain on the effects of eliminating teams, such as a dispersal draft.
Players: They claimed franchises could not be folded without the union's approval.
Resolution: Teams may not be eliminated through the 2006 season. The clubs may elect to eliminate two teams for the 2007 season, but must notify players by July 1, 2006. If the clubs elect to contract for 2007, the union would not contest before the National Labor Relations Board that contraction is a mandatory subject of bargaining. If clubs elect to eliminate teams they do not have to identify at that time.

Drug Testing
Owners: Wanted mandatory random drug testing for illegal steroids, nutritional supplements like the testosterone-booster androstenedione and for "recreational'' drugs like cocaine.
Players: Agreed to mandatory random testing for illegal steroids, opposed mandatory random testing for nutritional supplements and for "recreational'' drugs.
Resolution: All players will be randomly tested for illegal steroids in 2003 as a survey. If 5 percent or more test positive in any survey year, mandatory random testing for illegal steroids shall take place during the following two years. If 2.5 percent or fewer test positive in consecutive years, mandatory random testing shall cease. In any year in which there is not mandatory random testing, there shall be survey testing. The first time a player tests positive during mandatory random testing, he is placed in a treatment program. For subsequent positive tests, penalties range from a 30-day suspension to a two-year suspension.

Luxury Tax
Owners: To slow salary growth, owners wanted a 50 percent luxury tax on the portions of payrolls above $98 million (including 40-man rosters and benefits). The previous labor contract called for a 35 percent tax in 1997 and 1998, and a 34 percent tax in 1999, levied on the portions of payrolls above the midpoint of the fifth-highest payroll and sixth-highest payroll. Because the payroll was not fixed, most owners concluded it was ineffective, but the union claims it kept the highest spenders closer to the other teams. Teams paid $12.1 million in 1997, $6.6 million in 1998 and $12 million in 1999, a total of $30.6 million.
Players: Philosophically opposed a luxury tax.
Resolution: A luxury tax will be levied on high-payroll teams to discourage spending. Portions of payrolls will be taxed, with the threshold starting at $117 million next year and rising to $120.5 million in 2004, $128 million in 2005 and $136.5 million in 2006. The rate will be 17.5-40 percent, depending on the season and the number of times a team goes over the threshold. The tax expires on the final day of the 2006 season, meaning that if the sides play under the status quo in 2007, there would be no tax.

Minimum Payrolls
Owners: Proposed a $45 million minimum payroll (including 40-man rosters and benefits), to address concerns that owners may keep additional revenue-sharing money. Only Montreal and Tampa Bay were below that this season.
Players: As opposed to payroll floors as they are to payroll ceilings.
Resolution: Not included in agreement.

Revenue Sharing
Owners: In hopes to decrease revenue disparity, they proposed increasing revenue sharing, which began in 1996. Under the current system, called a split-pool plan, each team contributed 20 percent of its net local revenue, after deductions for ballpark expenses, to a pool. Seventy-five percent of the pool is redistributed equally to all 30 teams, and 25 percent is redistributed only to the teams with local revenue below the major league average. They first proposed that each team contribute 50 percent of its net local revenue, after deductions for ballpark expenses, to a pool that would be redistributed equally to all 30 teams. Using 2001 figures, the amount of shared money would have increased from $167 million to $298 million.
Players: First proposed continuing the split-pool plan and having each team contribute 22.5 percent of its net local revenue, after deductions for ballpark expenses. Using 2001 figures, the amount of shared money would have increased to $228 million. Resolution: Each team contributes 34 percent of its net local revenue, after deductions for ballpark expenses, to a pool that is redistributed equally to all 30 teams. In addition, $72.2 million annually will be taken from those teams that are net payers in base plan and redistributed to teams that are net receivers in base plan.

Salary Arbitration
Owners: Wanted to eliminate salary arbitration eligibility of "Super Twos'' -- the top 17 percent by service time of those players with two or more years but less than three years of major league service. In the 1985 contract, the eligibility of players with two or more but less than three years of major league service was eliminated. Eligibility for the "Super Twos'' -- approximately 12 each year -- was restored in the 1990 contract and left unchanged in the 1997 contract. Owners also wanted to be able to withdraw contract offers to players after salary arbitration figures are exchanged each Jan. 18.
Players: Opposed changes.
Resolution: No changes.

Suspensions
Owners: Wanted to be able to suspend players without pay for on-field misconduct, which would have overturned a pair of grievance decisions won by the union.
Players: Opposed changes.
Resolution: No changes.




 More from ESPN...
Q & A: How the labor deal works
ESPN.com's Jayson Stark ...
From Wrigley to Safeco, it's back to baseball
Within minutes of the ...

Labor deal saves Twins, could send Expos to D.C.
Baseball's labor agreement ...

No strike: Players, MLB agree on deal
Major League Baseball and its ...

Chronology of key events in baseball negotiations
Chronology of key events in ...

 ESPN Tools
Email story
 
Most sent
 
Print story